Analysis of Navy EIS – Northwest Training and Testing

Freelan_SalishSea_125 From WWU

June 16, 2016 – The West Coast Action Alliance is publishing its Analysis and Notes on the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing EIS along with other documents:

The Navy’s Incidental Take of Marine Mammals and Endangered Species in Pacific Northwest Waters: An Analysis

and a chart adding up the numbers in four corners of the North Pacific Ocean: Takes by Species of Marine Mammal

To read the Navy’s EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) in sections, click here.

Can anything be done about noise and marine mammals? Yes. Read about NOAA’s “Ocean Noise Strategy Roadmap” summarized in this New York Times article and show your concern by sending comments to: Your subject line should say “ONS Roadmap Comments” and email your comments until July 1, 2016. Include any citations to scientific literature you know of, as this is a search for information, too.

2 orca breach

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Analysis of Navy EIS – Northwest Training and Testing

A plan to give whales some peace and quiet


Unfortunately, this is not the “peace and quiet” we were hoping for; the Navy has evidently claimed another whale. Photo credit: Cascadia Research

June 6, 2016 – Another dead whale has been found in Puget Sound. This one was a young humpback that died after becoming trapped under the Navy’s docks at Bremerton (see photo below.) According to a report from Cascadia Research, “There was bruising at multiple locations consistent with it struggling after become trapped but these did not seem extensive enough to kill the animal. The exam could not rule out drowning related to becoming trapped under the dock. While not all tissues could be accessed and collected, additional tests will be conducted on some of the tissues that could be collected and these could provide additional insight into the cause of death.” This is the second whale death in little more than a month.


Young humpback whale trapped under Navy’s docks at Bremerton. She died there. How could this happen? Photo credit: Cascadia Research

Starvation is not a likely factor in this whale’s death, because Cascadia’s report said, “There were food remains in the intestines and colon indicating the whale had been feeding recently on fish as well as possibly krill and these suggest the cause of death was more sudden and acute.”

This post explains the enormous increases in Navy activities in our waters.


The Navy is disavowing culpability in this whale’s death; in fact, a Kitsap Sun news story reported that the “40-foot beast floated late Wednesday morning beneath a Puget Sound Naval Shipyard dock. A Navy boat towed it out of the way, into the bay.” It did not report that the whale had become trapped under the docks while still alive. Why? Did the Navy not notice a live 40-foot whale under its docks? Did they omit this or the fact that the whale was known to have been alive under there, when talking to news reporters? Does the Navy plan to retrofit its docks so this won’t happen again?

While shipping noise in general is a major factor in the silencing of whales’ ability to find food and each other, it is also a published fact that Navy underwater drones used in inland waters will increase from 140 to 161, that unmanned surface vehicles (which the Navy admits has trouble seeing sailboats) in inland waters are increasing from 2 to 25, that torpedoes used in inland waters will see huge increases, and worst of all, that acoustic testing and “life cycle” activity for sonar will increase at the Navy’s docks to 284 events per year.

Did the Navy run one of these acoustic tests while the whale was nearby?

Consider the fact that because of these increases the Navy is being allowed to “take” nearly 12 million whales, dolphins, porpoises and other marine mammals in the North Pacific, and that the takes breakdown for our waters covered by their Northwest Training and Testing EIS is as follows:

Coastal waters of California, Oregon and Washington:                575,258

Washington inland waters (Puget Sound, Hood Canal):              343,310

Southeast Alaska:                                                                              10,950

Eastern North Pacific (offshore)                                                     21,996

Consider also that because some of the Navy’s increases in activity are more than a thousand percent, it should be obvious that their contributions to the increasing levels of noise in the ocean are significant. Ocean noise has been doubling every decade. That’s from the Navy’s own figures.

The upshot? Maybe we should learn to expect more dead whales.

Or maybe there’s a better way. Natural Resource Defense Council Director of Marine Mammal protection Michael Jasny put it best. He said, “Unlike other ocean pollutants, this problem can be solved. Once you stop making noise, it goes away.”

An Ocean Noise Strategy Roadmap summarized in this New York Times article proposes to summarize the current status of noise in the oceans and the science that documents it; it will help NOAA to recommend cross-agency actions that will reduce this noise, and NOAA is asking for public comments. Please send your comments to, and make sure you put “ONS Roadmap Comments” in the subject line and any supporting data or literature citations with your comments, as appropriate. Even if you are not a scientist and don’t have data or scientific literature to reference, your comments are important because NOAA needs to know how much public concern there is.

The health of whales is an indicator of the health of our oceans. The health of our oceans is an indicator of the health of our planet. Even the most jaded person cannot ignore the fact that our oceans are worth $24 trillion dollars, and that if the ocean was a country it’d be the seventh largest economy on the planet.

Finance aside, the way we treat these intelligent cetaceans will be a measure of our collective humanity.

Sonic Sea - sperm whale

Sperm whale. Photo credit: Sonic Sea

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A plan to give whales some peace and quiet

How the Navy gets its way, part 5: Forcible Evacuation


Tinian Island after the military took it over for war games.

May 30, 2016 – While the country celebrates Memorial Day and thanks veterans and serving military for their service to our nation, American citizens are about to be forcibly evacuated from an island they’ve inhabited for 3,000 years.


Pagan Island (pronounced pa-GAHN) as it looks now, before the Navy claims it for bombing practice.

The people of the Northern Mariana Islands in the western Pacific  decided in the 1970s to not seek independence, but instead to forge closer ties with the United States. They established a commonwealth in political union with the United States in 1975. Like other U.S. territories, the islands do not have representation in the U.S. Senate, but, since 2009, are represented in the U.S. House of Representatives by a delegate who may vote in committee, but not on the House floor.


The Northern Marianas are a US Commonwealth.

In 2013 the US Navy and Marine Corps announced their intention to turn all of Pagan Island (pronounced “pa-GAHN”) in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands into a live-fire bombing range and training area. The military requested “unfettered and uninterrupted access” to the island, which means the people are to be forcibly removed. Pagan is called “the jewel of the Pacific” because it’s pristine and biologically rich but also fragile. It has been the ancestral and spiritual home of the Chamorro and Carolinian peoples for more than 3,000 years, with recorded history dating back to the 1300s, and is being proposed as an ecotourism resort.


Pagan Island. The Navy has refused to communicate with indigenous peoples in their own languages, thus denying them the right to know what the plans are.

Because of a 1981 volcanic eruption that caused temporary relocation of many but not all residents, families who had to leave the island have been wanting to return ever since. Some residents never left and still live there. “It is one of the most habitable islands in the Mariana chain,” said Dr. Michael Hadfield, a biologist at the University of Hawaii who has studied the island’s unique flora and fauna. Unfortunately, the government has for decades denied resettlement to most of the island’s former residents who have applied, and now the Navy and Marines claim the island is “uninhabited,” which is not true. Because of the volcano they say it’s “too hazardous” for resettlement. And they intend to forcibly evacuate the island’s remaining residents so bombing can commence in 2017.

According to the Los Angeles Times, massive, “guns-blazing war games on Pagan at least 16 weeks a year” would allow aerial, naval, field artillery, grenade, mortar, laser, and rocket bombardment. The Navy says it’ll be a good steward of the island, but with more than 700,000 live rounds to be fired yearly, that’s hard to imagine. And with fewer than 600 of the island’s 11,680 acres officially surveyed for cultural resources, how would the military know where not to bomb? More than 180 historic sites are known on the island, 110 of which are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Contractors working for the Navy identified six of those sites, after which the Navy discontinued the survey. That is the military equivalent of shoot, shovel and shut up.

A disturbing chain of events and manipulation has led to this crisis: READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE


Opposition to forcible evacuation and seizing their ancestral home is universal in the western Pacific.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on How the Navy gets its way, part 5: Forcible Evacuation

The unbearable noise

Water texture

May 16, 2016 – Noise in the sea is killing and injuring wildlife.

“The Navy merely received a slap on the wrist and the public was never aware of the true nature of the Take or the violations.” -anonymous Navy source to Truthout reporter Dahr Jamail

The numbers are shocking. The online news organization Truthout published their top story this morning, on the excessively high numbers of marine mammals the US Navy is allowed to “take” as a result of exploding mines and bombs and using sonar in sensitive habitats during testing and training exercises. Truthout senior investigative reporter Dahr Jamail researched and wrote it after noticing this post from the West Coast Action Alliance.

Coincidentally, the New York Times wrote last week that Navy sonar “cannot be ruled out as cause of death” for dolphins in Southern California.

Which brings us to this: 23 organizations are sponsoring a showing of the movie “Sonic Sea” on Monday, May 23 from 7-9 PM at the Quimper Unitarian Universalist Fellowship (QUUF) in Port Townsend, Washington, 2333 San Juan Avenue. The eye-opening film reveals how noise from Navy sonar, drilling operations and everyday vessel traffic adversely impacts whales and other sea life. (Watch trailer here.) A donation of $10 is suggested at the door.

Two world renowned experts and cast members will be at the screening – Ken Balcomb of the Center for Whale Research and Michael Jasny of the National Resources Defense Council. They will speak and, after the film, lead a Q&A session. (Press release here.) If you are not in the area, check this site for more screenings, or to host one in your area. To learn more, download the Ocean Noise Report. See you there.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The unbearable noise

Low oxygen delivery endangers pilots, civilians

May 14, 2016 – “Nothing scares a Hornet/Growler pilot more that losing oxygen – and it happens all the time.” This article in the Navy Times details the problem, which pilots have identified as their top concern. But read the comments, some are from pilots who add perspective, including the fact that the problem is decades old and the new, less reliable oxygen delivery system replaced the old reliable one because it made maintenance cheaper.

Here’s the issue as we see it: While the West Coast Action Alliance maintains our vigorous objections to the Navy’s encroachment on public lands, waters and airspaces over civilian communities, we also vigorously object to the fact that when the Pentagon’s focus becomes “How much money can we spend on defense contractors making new weapons” instead of “How can we take care of the people who serve and who’ve served,” then they put lives in danger unnecessarily, both in the air and on the ground. This is a fixable problem and the Navy is not fixing it. Do they not have the money? Not when you look at this list that shows at least 2/3 of the Pentagon’s budget goes to defense contractors. Of the top 37 US contractors, all but 4 are defense, and development of new weaponry takes priority. Humanity already knows ways to kill itself a thousand times over, but preventable jet crashes should not be one of them.

If a Navy jet ever crashes and hypoxia is found to be the cause, it will likely be a matter of criminal negligence.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Low oxygen delivery endangers pilots, civilians

Leaked Navy emails show intent to violate law

USFWS Marbled_murrelet

Marbled murrelet-gate?

May 9, 2016 – A series of internal emails leaked by an anonymous Navy source to Truthout investigative reporter Dahr Jamail reveal a deliberate willingness by the US Navy to flout federal law; the story was published today.

The gist? Navy personnel have been “working to manipulate the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biologists into bending the law, then proceeded to break the law, whilst the consultations between the two entities are ongoing.”

A quick reading of the emails also reveals an unprecedented level of intimidation by Pentagon-level officials, of FWS field biologists.

According to the article, Navy sonar and explosive activities are a double whammy for marbled murrelets, “… secretive diving seabirds that nest in old-growth forests, which makes them vulnerable to both jet noise and sonar.” The Navy’s John Mosher frankly admits in one email, “We are conducting these activities without coverage.” Meaning, a valid permit to “take” (harm) threatened and endangered species does not exist, which is illegal.
The emails show the Navy trying to force the FWS to shrink its definition of harm by eliminating both temporary hearing loss caused by explosives, and behavior changes of all kinds, from the standards for measuring harm. This too would be illegal if the FWS complied with that request. It is possibly the reason for concern that has caused an unprecedented delay in completing the Biological Opinion (and the take permit that accompanies it) that the Navy wanted last September. According to the FWS, neither is complete and the consultation is still open. Which raises big questions about the legality of the Navy’s ongoing activities.

West Coast Action Alliance spokesperson Karen Sullivan, who was asked to analyze the emails, said, “If an evaluation of harm to a species rules out standard definitions of harm, encourages use of data more than 40 years old and prohibits the presence of adequately trained observers, then it neither gives the benefit of the doubt to the species nor uses the best available information — and thus does not contribute to legally defensible solutions.”
What will it take to make the Navy follow the law? Must the citizens who already pay for the Pentagon’s $600 billion dollar budget also have to sue them to keep them honest?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Leaked Navy emails show intent to violate law

Facts about increased Navy ocean activity in the Pacific Northwest

Update May 12, 2016: Navy sonar not ruled out in dolphin deaths off Southern California.

April 26, 2016 – Analysis of increases and some impacts as shown in the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing EIS.

Orcas breaching

Orcas breaching

It’s obvious even to tourists that the increase in Navy activity in our Northwest waters, public lands, and skies is huge. But how big? The West Coast Action Alliance examined the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) and the Letters of Authorization  for incidental takes of marine mammals issued by NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service. We found some startling numbers. These numbers apply only to the coastal waters of Northern California, Oregon, Washington and Southeast Alaska, as well as inland waters including the San Juan Islands, Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Click on any image to enlarge it.

Screen shot NWTT EIS map

Map from the Navy’s EIS showing the Northwest Training and Testing Range. This does not include any other ranges such as the Electronic Warfare Range on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula.

The NWTT EIS is still open because the Navy has not been able to sign a final Record of Decision (ROD) due to the fact that the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s endangered species consultation is still not finished, seven months after publication of the EIS. This is unprecedented.

First, a comparison of baseline to proposed numbers of activities listed in the October 2015 EIS revealed the following:

72% increase in electronic warfare operations,

50% increase in explosive ordance disposal in Crescent Harbor and Hood Canal,

244% increase in air combat maneuvers (dogfighting)

400% increase in air-to-surface missile exercises (including Olympic National Marine Sanctuary),

400% increase in helicopter tracking exercises,

778% increase in number of torpedoes in inland waters,

3,500% increase in number of sonobuoys,

From none to 284 sonar testing events in inland waters,

From none to 286 “Maritime Security Operations” using 1,320 small-caliber rounds (blanks) in Hood Canal, Dabob Bay, Puget Sound & Strait of Juan de Fuca,

72% increase in chaff dropped from aircraft (contains tiny glass fibers and more than a dozen metals,)

1,150% increase in drone aircraft,

1,150% increase in drone surface vehicles,

1,450% increase in expendable devices. These are just a few.

140915-N-UN259-006 PACIFIC OCEAN (Sept. 15, 2014) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Stethem (DDG 63) fires a Harpoon missile during a sinking exercise as part of Valiant Shield 2014. Air and sea units from the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force participated in the sinking exercise of the ex-USS Fresno to gain proficiency in tactics, targeting and live-firing against a surface target at sea. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Alonzo M. Archer/Released)

PACIFIC OCEAN (Sept. 15, 2014) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Stethem (DDG 63) fires a Harpoon missile during a sinking exercise as part of Valiant Shield 2014. Air and sea units from the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force participated in the sinking exercise of the ex-USS Fresno.

There are no changes to the following:

2 ship sinking exercises each year with 24 bombs, 22 missiles, 80 large caliber rounds and 2 heavyweight high explosive torpedoes,

30 air-to-surface bombing exercises, including in the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary,

160 gunnery exercises with small, medium & large caliber rounds, missiles, and high explosive warheads offshore, includes Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary,

An active-duty Navy pilot confided that fuel dumping incidents occur more often than the public realizes; they happen about once a month.

And there are more.


Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary extends well into to offshore waters; the Navy is exempted from many prohibitions that protect marine species.

Now let’s look at the figures for “takes” to marine mammals. A “take” is a form of harm ranging from disturbance to injury to death. Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act  there are two classifications, called Level A and Level B.  Level B is mostly harassment, and Level A is injury (or death.) Most takes allowed are in the harassment category, but harassment causes behavior changes such as abandonment of feeding, nursing, and migration habitat. If a marine mammal that relies on echolocation to find food can’t hear, it has to work harder to feed itself. If it can’t take in extra food, it loses weight. A study on the increases in metabolism in bottlenose dolphins showed that after the animals had to work harder to find food or be heard, it took another 7 minutes per episode for oxygen consumption to return to normal levels. That translates eventually to starvation if they cannot find enough food to make up the difference.

Sperm whale

Sperm whale

The problem with Level A harassment is in documenting injuries or deaths; frequent mass strandings have occurred days after naval activity in an area, but in nearly every case the Navy disavows being the cause. They do not allow federal wildlife agency experts aboard their ships because of security concerns about civilians; however, civilian fitness instructors are found on many Navy ships. None of the mitigation measures require the Navy to tow hydrophones to listen for marine mammals before commencing exercises; the Navy’s technology for observing whether marine mammals are present is the same that has been used since the 17th century: two lookouts at the bow of the ship.

A recent study found that climate change can affect fur seal pups in their first few months of life. Wetter and windier conditions are predicted for Antarctica in the coming years. Young fur seals will expend more energy keeping warm and, thus, less energy growing and developing. (Photo Credit: Jordan Spielman)

Seal pups. Younger animals are more vulnerable to harassment, and less able to recover from it.

The noise threshold for hearing damage in humans is 85 decibels. For every 10-decibel increase, the intensity of the noise increases by a factor of ten; therefore, a 115-decibel noise, which is roughly what a Growler jet makes when passing overhead at altitude of 1000 feet, is a thousand times louder than the 85-decibel threshold for human hearing damage. Navy sonar is capable of at least 235 decibels at the source. This is over 10 trillion times more intense than the 85-decibel threshold. At a distance of 300 miles away from the source, underwater noise can still be 140 decibels. 140 decibels is sufficient to vibrate and rupture internal organs, and has been assessed by the French government as “a weapon to kill people.”

splashdatamap Hawaiian Humpback feeding-migration areas

Humpback feeding and migration areas

What does this mean? Since the Navy is positioning its ships in whale migration routes and feeding areas without regard to peak times of use for the animals, it means the animals will continue to work harder and to lose weight if they can’t find enough to eat, which is already exacerbated by climate change and decreasing abundance of their food. Since 30 large whales washed up on Alaskan beaches last summer in what NOAA called an “Unusual Mortality Event,” and since it was during the time Navy ships were up there conducting “Operation Northern Edge” sonar and bombing exercises, and since every single dead whale was also emaciated, one has to wonder who in their right mind wouldn’t take steps to reduce harassment of already-stressed animals.


Here are take numbers from the Northwest Training and Testing EIS, for just the waters from Northern California to Southeast Alaska, including Puget Sound and other inland waters, for a 5-year period:

Whales (toothed and baleen)         18,921

Dolphins and porpoises                   843,465

Seals and sea lions                            364,538

Totals:                                               1,226,924

Here are those numbers broken down by NWTT area:

Coastal waters of California, Oregon and Washington:                575,258

Washington inland waters (Puget Sound, Hood Canal):              343,310

Southeast Alaska:                                                                              10,950

Eastern North Pacific (offshore)                                                     21,996

Remember, these numbers do not include takes to endangered and threatened seabirds, fish, sea turtles or terrestrial species impacted by Navy activities, using sonar, explosives, underwater and surface drones, sonobuoys, ships, submarines, aircraft, or troops training on 68 beaches and state parks in western Washington. The numbers also do not include takes for smaller projects such as underwater detonation exercises and/or pile-driving and construction at Port Angeles, Bremerton, Everett, Kitsap, or Whidbey Island, nor does it include impacts from sonar and other acoustic devices at the Keyport Range Complex Expansion, or any impacts brushed over in dozens of Environmental Assessments that split the projects into smaller pieces so they don’t rise to the threshold of a full-blown EIS.


Migration routes for endangered Leatherback Sea Turtles

With regard to the 72% increase in chaff, the EIS says it is “…typically packaged in cylinders approximately 6 in. by 1.5 in. (15.2 cm by 3.8 cm), weighing about 5 oz. (140 g), and containing a few million fibers. Chaff may be deployed from an aircraft or may be launched from a surface vessel. The chaff fibers are approximately the thickness of a human hair (generally 25.4 microns in diameter) and range in length from 0.3 to 2 in. (0.8 to 5.1 cm). The major components of the chaff glass fibers and the aluminum coating are alumina, boron oxide, sodium oxide, potassium oxide, copper, manganese, silicon, iron, zinc,vanadium, titanium, and other metals.”

A 1997 Air Force study reviewed the potential impacts of chaff inhalation on humans, livestock, and other animals and concluded that the fibers are “…too large to be inhaled into the lungs.” Whose lungs? A fiber the thickness of a human hair is certainly inhalable by human beings, even children. And what about marine mammals with upturned and very large breathing holes? The fibers, said the study, were predicted to be deposited in the nose, mouth, or trachea and either swallowed or expelled. Has the public been made aware of the effects of chaff ingestion? Is chaff inhalation or ingestion by marine mammals considered a taking? Not that we could see.

chemring_co chaff UK

Chaff being dropped from a fighter jet. Chaff is often accompanied by flares.

The West Coast Action Alliance noticed some discrepancies among the Letters of Authorization (LOA) issued by NOAA to the Navy for takes; for example, more than 133,000 takes for bottlenose dolphins off the Northern California-Oregon-Washington coast were not listed in the LOA for the Northwest Training and Testing EIS – they were in the LOA for Hawaii-Southern California. Why? We don’t know, but the omission certainly helped to reduce the appearance of large numbers of marine mammal takes in the NWTT area. Curious, we looked at the LOAs for four EISs done in four regions of the North Pacific: the Gulf of Alaska, the Pacific Northwest coast, Hawaii-Southern California, and the Marianas Islands. What we found was shocking.

gray whale breaching

Gray whale

When you consider, for example, that the best estimate for the number of gray whales in the eastern North Pacific is 21,000, and that they migrate up and down the West Coast from Alaska to Mexico, but that the numbers of takes allowed to the Navy in the areas of the Pacific where gray whales might be found is 62,550, it becomes clear that multiple harassment incidents to the same animals throughout their range are not only anticipated but allowed.

Gray whale global distribution

Where gray whales are found

The WCAA also found it interesting and disturbing that neither sonar, bombing, explosives, nor any military activity whatsoever is included on NOAA’s list of threats caused by human impacts. Why, when this this much harm is being done on such a scale?

Takes by species: If you add up all the Navy’s takes of whales, dolphins, porpoises, seals and sea lions for these four regions of the North Pacific for a 5-year period, it is nearly 12 million.

Click here to see the take numbers broken down by individual species and regions, but you might want to be sitting down, it’s a horrifying picture. And remember, it only includes marine mammals.

The Navy prides itself on a concept it calls “Distributed Lethality,” the definition of which is “ …the condition gained by increasing the offensive power of individual components of the surface force (cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships [LCSs], amphibious ships, and logistics ships) and then employing them in dispersed offensive formations known as “hunter-killer SAGs.” SAG stands for “Surface Action Group.” The Navy has already sent a “hunter-killer pack of ships” into the Pacific toward Asia, in a clear sign that war games across the globe evidently know no limits to civilians.

It’s also clear that when it comes to wildlife, the Navy distributes lethality very, very well.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Facts about increased Navy ocean activity in the Pacific Northwest

Same ship, same incident, two dates? (updated)


Coming to land, sea, and skies near you: more military hardware

April 13, 2016 – UPDATED with email from a Navy pilot April 19 (below) – What is going on here?  We publish this as an example of a rather strange puzzle. Same ship, same incident, two or possibly three dates over two years. In April 2014, the USS Donald Cook was supposedly buzzed by a Russian fighter jet in the Black Sea, which disabled the entire ship’s electronic capacity. Nobody but a few internet sites paid much attention to the story. Why? Because it was dismissed by the military: “I have difficulty believing that two Russian pilots, on their own, would choose to take such an action,” Col. Steve Warren said during a Pentagon briefing…

A defense industry chatroom asked, “Is this nothing more than Russian propaganda or could there be an element of truth to it?” So, today, April 13, 2016, the Military Times published it as a “breaking story” with the screaming headline, “Russian attack aircraft just flew within 30 feet of a U.S. Navy ship.” What, again?  Is the Navy so unfortunate as to allow two or three incidents over two years in the same place to the same ship? Or is it another ploy to alarm an already alarmed population, for the purpose of goading us into more spending? If the Navy, with its immense budget, 2/3 of which goes to defense industry contractors, can’t get their act together after three incidents, or, more likely, it allows the defense industry to publish lies which are now getting picked up by major news outlets, then what are we to make of that? Sounds like the Navy better do some serious disavowing soon, or come clean on what really happened.

UPDATE APRIL 19: Email from a retired Navy carrier pilot: “This incident has been the subject of several emails from my old Navy buds. Low-level passes have been common by both countries since the beginning of the cold war in 1946. I was personally guilty of it on four occasions. The troops on deck love any break in the boredom. Someone chose to make this an international incident. Here is one comment:

”Russians put on an air show for the lonely sailors in the Baltic Sea and the typical black shoe response was to call it an international incident. Personally, if I were sitting on a tin can at sea in today’s Navy (that’s code for soft drinks only) I would welcome the sight of some Fencers at sea level doing 450 knots. Perhaps a better response from the skipper would be all hands on deck except for the Block 1B Phalanx guys who need some low level tracking practice.”

And a response: ”…could not possibly agree more. We’ve all done this. Russian flybys by their F-111ski. Bring it!”

Your WCAA comment is right. Someone is pedaling hardware. Feel free to post it.”


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Same ship, same incident, two dates? (updated)

Videotaped presentation by Dahr Jamail and Karen Sullivan

April 8, 2016 – By Air, Land and Sea: Deconstructing the Navy’s plans for Washington State:  Watch Truthout Senior Investigative Reporter Dahr Jamail and West Coast Action Alliance co-founder Karen Sullivan present the evidence in this 72-minute recording made at the Port Angeles Library in March 2016.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 7.45.18 AM


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Videotaped presentation by Dahr Jamail and Karen Sullivan

Why we don’t publish our names

Orwell on journalism

Dear Readers,

Recently we were upbraided by an elected official for not signing our names to the emails we send, or signing these posts. It’s understandable to wonder why, so it’s time to explain. Due to multiple threats and abusive behaviors directed toward many people who’ve spoken out, we disabled public comments on this web site and no longer sign WCAA emails sent to those who sign up (see right side of this page.) The threats and abusive behavior have come from Navy personnel, and from a group of Navy contractors representing “Team Whidbey.”


“Team Whidbey” gets an award from the Navy, January 2016. Article in the Whidbey Daily News.

We have documented the abuse with screen shots and narrative, posted it, and reported it to the Navy command, but to no avail. We know that not signing our names flies in the face of the transparency we seek from our government, but when you are personally named in multiple newspaper letters to the editor as a “threat to 30,000 jobs” and you have Navy personnel publicly saying they’d like to “strap you to a Growler and fly you into ISIS territory to see how much guts you have” or a pilot tells you the dart board at the officer’s club has your face on it, and the tone of that continuous smear campaign implies that violence might not be out of line because you are a traitor, and they tell you on social media that they know where you live, you start to take precautions with your personal safety.

UPDATE APRIL 2, 2016: The Seattle Times published an article on its front page, called “Jets, helicopters, rockets: Military plans more uses of Northwest public lands.” You will see that “Team Whidbey” and its supporters are again harassing and intimidating people in the comments section.

To read these illustrations, click to enlarge.

Screen Shot Boycott campaign

Social media post from Navy contractor running the “Boycott Port Townsend and Al Jazeera” campaign.

When two Navy personnel in blue fatigues sat down right next to five of us on an otherwise empty Keystone-to-Port Townsend ferry, and made it obvious they were recording our conversation and snapping our photos with their iPhones, it was disconcerting and intimidating. The traitor inference comes from “Team Whidbey” and others objecting via months and months of letters to the editor and in trolling public forums, to Truthout reporter Dahr Jamail, a fourth generation American who has frequently written about the Navy. They vilify him in veiled racist ways, and publicly print again and again, in multiple forums, that I (Karen Sullivan) am “colluding with Al Jazeera.” They evidently wish to conflate Al Jazeera with Al Qaida in their social media audience’s minds. When it became known to Navy personnel and their supporters that I had been asked to write the Port Townsend City Council’s comment letter on an EIS last year, and when the contents of that comment letter became public, the threats and abusive behavior escalated. A Navy contractor organized a campaign he called “Boycott Port Townsend and Al Jazeera.”

Screen shot Seattle Weekly

One of many nasty responses to people who speak out, this one to Seattle Weekly reporter Dan Person after a March 1, 2016 article.

When an elderly woman commented in a public forum about how much the jet noise was impacting her recovery from a hip operation and how depressed it made her, a Navy pilot suggested she should go ahead and commit suicide, because, he said, the jet noise over her community was going to increase and they were going to “punish” her. He continued with the following, about a retired Air Force officer who wrote to complain about the noise and lack of respect:

note from pilot

Email from a Hornet pilot.

Trolls that included several active duty pilots jumped on a public Facebook page and intimidated public comments with their sarcasm and abusive language.

Screen Shot I can't believe I protect you morons

Interaction with a Navy pilot

I personally reported the abuse to the base commander and public affairs officer at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island more than a year ago, but received no reply. So I reported it to the Secretary of the Navy. No reply. Then I sent it to the White House. No reply, but the webmaster at the citizen’s group Citizens of the Ebey’s Reserve watched in astonishment as all abusive comments were stripped one by one from their site. The only reply we have seen from the Navy is a fact sheet that says the public is “confused” because of “misinformation.”

Facebook page title created at NASWI

Facebook campaign by Navy contractor now representing “Team Whidbey”

So, lack of any reply whatsoever from our two silent Senators, on any of the letters we have sent, none of which have been unreasonable, is doubly disturbing.

It’s not unpatriotic to ask your government to follow the law and to respect the citizens who pay dearly for their equipment and salaries. I’m the spokesperson for the West Coast Action Alliance, and I’m proud of it. I’m also verging on being a little old lady, and to see people who raise reasonable questions being targeted like this is scary. It also makes me mad, and by God I’m not backing down.


Karen Sullivan

*Footnote: Within two hours of publishing this post, Navy jets began flying lower and louder than usual, over Port Townsend.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Why we don’t publish our names